¶1The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons expressed/ in the per curiam opinion of this court in John Nix & Co. v. Hannah L. Andrews, &c., No. 86 of the November term, 1915.
¶2For affirmance—The ■ Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoi-i, Black, Terhune, Hehpenheimee, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal—-None.