Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 T.C. No. 2

WEST v. COMMISSIONERS

United States Tax Court

Decided January 7, 1987

United States Tax Court · decided 1987-01-07

Petitioner Joe H. West on their 1980 Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed a loss with respect to a purported investment in a motion picture. Held: petitioners did not invest in the motion picture with an actual and honest objective of making a profit and petitioners are not entitled to deductions for depreciation with respect to the motion picture.

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 1988

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JOE H. AND LESSIE M. WEST, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONERS OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
WEST v. COMMISSIONERS
Docket Nos. 20549-84, 20550-84.
1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 2; 88 T.C. No. 2;
January 7, 1987; WITHDRAWN January 8, 1987

¶1*2 Petitioner Joe H. West on their 1980 Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed a loss with respect to a purported investment in a motion picture. In fact, no investment was made by petitioners until December of 1981, and the motion picture was not produced until 1982.

¶2Held, petitioners did not invest in the motion picture with an actual and honest objective of making a profit and petitioners are not entitled to deductions for depreciation with respect to the motion picture. Heldfurther, petitioners are not entitled to a theft loss deduction under sec. 165, I.R.C. of 1954, with respect to the $11,400 cash paid to Commedia. Heldfurther, addition as to tax under sec. 6659 and sec. 6621(d), I.R.C. of 1954, are sustained.

Dwight J. L. Epperson, for the petitioners.
R. Alan Lockyear, for the respondent.

SWIFT

¶3SWIFT, Judge

/88/tcno/2 · .json · Public domain