Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 FSUPP 549 - RX Pharmacies Plus, Inc. v. Weil

RX Pharmacies Plus, Inc. v. Weil’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2015

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396N (§ 1915 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) any individual eligible for medical assistance ... may obtain such assistance from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or person, qualified to perform the service or services required ... and (B) an enrollment of an individual eligible for medical assistance in a primary care case-management system, ... a medicaid managed care organization, or a similar entity shall not restrict the choice of the qualified person from whom the individual may receive services ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the freedom of choice provisions, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23), were intended to protect Medicaid recipients, and do not confer any enforceable rights on Medicaid providers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “who undertakes to provide him such services.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.