884 F. Supp. 2d 334 - Mitchell v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12202 (§ 502 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.