Harrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona · Albrecht v. State · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A person commits an offense if, with the intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of a combination, he commits or conspires to commit one or more of the following: ⅝ ⅝ ⅜: ⅜ ⅝ ⅝ (5) unlawful manufacture, delivery, dispensation, or distribution of a controlled substance or dangerous drug, or unlawful possession of a controlled substance or dangerous drug through forgery, fraud, misrepresentation, or deception!.] TexPenal Code Ann. § 71.02(a)(5). The rather lengthy indictment alleges a conspiracy to deliver cocaine from September 3, 1986 to September 12, 1986. Appellant was one of over thirty people indicted for the instant offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.