Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

886 A.2d 222

In re Hummel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 2005

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2005-10-14

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2016

6 state decisions

Relies on McCracken Appeal · Dayhoff v. Weaver

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED based on 25 P.S. § 8157(a), and this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for a hearing on the merits. The trial court is instructed to cumulate such write-in ballots cast in the primary election as are in accordance with 25 P.S §§ 3062, 3063, 3155, Appeal of McCracken, 370 Pa. 562, 88 A.2d 787 (1952), and Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002, 1011 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.

/886/a2d/222 · .json · Public domain