Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

886 A.2d 682

In re Scanlon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 2005

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2005-11-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2019

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

PER CURIAM:

¶3AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 21, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that JAMES J. SCANLON, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

/886/a2d/682 · .json · Public domain