Rabinovitz v. Pena’s Empirical Analysis
89 F.3d 482 · 1996
Citation profile
36 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (1999), Regina C. Brown, v. Kenneth D. Brody, Chairman, Export-Import Bank of the United States, (1999)
36 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Crady v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. · Optimal Data Corp. v. United States · Anderson v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. · McCoy v. WGN Continental Broadcasting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a less distinguished title, a material loss of benefits, significantly diminished material responsibilities, or other indices that might be unique to a particular situation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff needs to show that his working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would have been compelled to resign.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“loss of a bonus is not an adverse employment action in a case . . . where the employee is not automatically entitled to the bonus,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.