Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 F.3d 828

Docket No. 96-6350.

Jones v. Jabe

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 11, 1996. Decided June 25, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Haynes v. State T

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Harris, No. CA-96-134-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/89/f3d/828 · .json · Public domain