¶1We concur in the view of the vice-chancellor that the proofs submitted fully justify the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to the relief sought by him in this case. The decree 'of divorce which the appellant seeks to review will be affirmed.
¶2For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.
¶3For reversal — None.