Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 N.J.L. 370

State v. Beavers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1916

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1916-06-19

On error to the Supreme Court, in which the following ;per curiam was filed: “Defendant was convicted of keeping disorderly house and brings error, assigning following reasons: “1. No evidence to sustain the charges. “This is not true, the evidence is ample. “2. No evidence that defendant had knowledge of or power to suppress the acts constituting the crime. The proof is that she was present taking the money for the illegal use of rooms. “3.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1955

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1916-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenciiaed, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Ter-KTTNE, IJePPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 13.

¶3For reversal—None.

/89/njl/370 · .json · Public domain