Harrison v. Dickerson

Decided November 20, 1916

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1916-11-20

The ground of the nonsuit was that the plaintiff, when sued in a justice’s court upon a cause of action that arose out of the same transaction, did not file any set-off or recoupment based upon the claim for which the action in the Pleas was brought. The judgment of nonsuit was erroneous under the cases of Sipley v. Wass, 47 N. J. L. 187, and Clancy v. Neumayer, 51 Id. 299.

Decided 1916-11-20

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeniieiaier, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, ,TJ. 12.

¶3For reversal—None.