United States v. Padgett’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.2d 445 · 1989
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2011 · most notably United States v. Chaney (1992), United States v. Guardino (1992)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. Shackleford (84-5995) · United States v. Purther · United States v. Durham · United States v. Richard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the court has the required information before it, and the defendant is given an opportunity to challenge such information, no specific findings need be made on the record.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the record must contain some indication that the sentencing court considered the defendant's financial condition in ordering restitution. We have never held that the court must make findings on the defendant's financial condition, and it is clear that the statute [ 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3580 ] does not require findings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall consider ... the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.