Khowaja v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.3d 1010 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Coleman v. Donahoe · Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. · Burks v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation · Peele v. Country Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A]n employee is similarly situated to a plaintiff if the two employees deal with the same supervisor, are subject to the same standards, and have engaged in similar conduct without such differentiating or mitigating circumstances as would distinguish their employer's treatment of them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only concerned with the proposition of sorting evidence into 'direct' and 'indirect' piles, and [its holding] did not alter the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daza v. State“simply whether the evidence would permit a reasonable factfinder to conclude that the plaintiff's race [or] ethnicity...caused the discharge or other adverse employment action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daza v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.