Clark v. Colbert’s Empirical Analysis
895 F.3d 1258 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Terry v. Ohio · Estelle v. Gamble · Graham v. Connor · Tennessee v. Garner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By offering an incomplete challenge to the district court's analysis, Clark has effectively abandoned his appeal of its ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bistline v. Parker“[P]olice officers can incur liability for 'reckless' conduct that begets a deadly confrontation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.