Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 So. 2d 495 - Taylor v. State

897 So. 2d 495 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 880 So. 2d 726 - Boyd v. State · State v. F.G. · 877 So. 2d 795 - Johnson v. State · Wright v. State · 638 So. 2d 515 - State v. F.G.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised by a Rule 3.800(a) motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.