Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Mass. 154

Trull v. Wilson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1812-06-15

This was also an action of debt, on a bond given by Wilson, a nrisoner in execution, at the suit of the plaintiff and his sureties.

Cited in Ballentine's (1916)’s definition of “Daytime” · Black's (1891)’s definition of “Daytime”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1812-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1973

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

1018121820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1Since the decision in the last case, the only question to be determined in this action is, whether the defendants are chargeable, on their bond, on account of the time of the prisoner Wilson’s being in a private house.

¶2By the statute of 1784, c. 41, § 9, prisoners having given bond, &c., are to have “ the liberty of the yard within the prison in the daytime.” The expression of daytime, here used, has always been construed to mean that portion of the twenty-four hours in which a man’s person and countenance are distinguishable. In this case, the daylight was not gone, and of consequence there was no escape,

¶3Judgment on the verdi&t.

/9/mass/154 · .json · Public domain