Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

902 So. 2d 340

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-05-27

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2017

6 state decisions

Relies on Mills v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LaROSE, Judge.

¶1Phillip John Wilson appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of Al-prazolam. We affirm the judgment and sentence, with one exception. We strike the $1000 fine imposed under section 775.083(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2003), and remand for correction of the written order assessing fines and costs.

¶2The trial court orally pronounced a fine of $100 under section 775.083(l)(c). The trial court also pronounced other fines and costs not at issue on appeal and stated: “The total [is] $951.” The written order reflects a fine of $1000 and a total of $1951 in fines and costs.

¶3The written order must comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Mills v. State, 765 So.2d 153, 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The error was properly preserved by a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), which was denied. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court with directions to conform the written order assessing fines and costs to the oral pronouncement.

¶4Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
/902/so2d/340 · .json · Public domain