United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.2d 133 · 1990
Citation profile
47
cited by 47 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited
37 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3561 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 472
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any other sentence that was available ... at the time of the initial sentencing”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Similarly, where a term of supervised release is discretionary, see Sentencing Guidelines § 5Dl.l(b), the court ought to be able to consider the probation viola tion in deciding whether to impose such a term. And whether supervised release is discretionary or mandatory, see id. § 5Dl.l(a), the court should be able to consider the violation in determining the conditions, and, within the range prescribed by law, the duration of the term, see id. § 5D1.2.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.