Guilford v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State · 595 So. 2d 8 - Breedlove v. Singletary · 487 So. 2d 1156 - Seccia v. Wainwright · Guilford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court properly dismissed the petition, pointing out that habeas corpus is not a second appeal mechanism, and may not be used to litigate issues that could or should have been raised on direct appeal. See, e.g., Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So.2d 8 (Fla.1992). Further, it noted that habeas corpus relief is not available with respect to claims that could be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). All of the issues raised in Guilford's petition below could or should have been raised in a direct appeal or by a motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, and the applicable time limits to raise them have long since passed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State“[i]n substance... an appeal of the trial court's order which dismissed his petition for writ of habeas corpus or an appeal of an order summarily dismissing a Rule 3.850 motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.