Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

91 N.J. Eq. 154

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1919

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1919-11-17

Thereafter, in December, 1916, defendant presented his petition in which he alleged that he had learned since the hearing of the case, that during its pendencji', petitioner had been guilty of improper conduct with one William H. Lyons, and thereupon the entry of the decree in petitioner’s favor was stayed, and leave was granted to defendant to file a cross-petition for divorce on the ground of adultery alleged to have been committed by the petitioner with one William H.…

Decided 1919-11-17

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Poster.

¶2For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ÁCKERSON-14.

¶3For reversal — None.

/91/njeq/154 · .json · Public domain