91 N.J.L. 345
Decided October 11, 1917
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1917-10-11
“The case comes up for review on strict bill of exceptions and assignments of error, and must be so considered by this court, notwithstanding the contention of counsel for the plaintiff in error that, because his client intended to claim the wider review provided by the one hundred and thirty-sixth section of the Criminal Procedure act, we should give him the benefit of his intention, without regard to the fact that he failed to take any of the steps required by the statute…
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
“The judgment under review will be affirmed · Decided 1917-10-11
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1968
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.