Korman v. Livesey

Decided January 31, 1918

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1918-01-31

“The couid deducted certain items from the sum claimed, amounting to §21.20, and gave judgment for plaintiff for the balance. “It is urged in support of this appeal that it was error to refuse to admit in evidence a copy of a three days’ notice to proceed with the contract which the defendant testified she mailed to the plaintiff.

“The judgment will be affirmed · Decided 1918-01-31

Pee Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal — None.