Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 912 F. Supp. 565 - Batson v. Powell

912 F. Supp. 565 - Batson v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

20 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 265 F. Supp. 2d 52 - Bryant v. Brownlee (2003), 44 F. Supp. 2d 8 - Childers v. Slater (1999)

20 district · 1 state decisions

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Within 90 days after the filing of a complaint in a case sought to be maintained as a class action, unless the court in the exercise of its discretion has extended this period, the plaintiff shall move for a certification under Rule 23(c)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the case may be so maintained. In ruling upon the motion, the court may allow the action to be so maintained, may deny the motion, or may order that a ruling be postponed pending discovery or other appropriate preliminary proceedings. A defendant may move at any time to strike the class action allegations or to dismiss the complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether guards were held to different standards of compliance with the terms of the policy depending on their gender,” not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As this Court has made clear, the 90-day limit of Local Rule 203(b) has been strictly enforced in this Circuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.