Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 F.2d 174

Docket No. 90-8121.

In Re George Sassower

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 16, 1990.

Relies on Witherspoon v. Doe

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-11-16

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-90-322-HAR)

George Sassower, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

George Sassower brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to act on his motions filed in his civil suit. This issue is moot. Since Sassower filed his mandamus petition the district court has denied his motions. Accordingly, we grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

¶2

PETITION DENIED.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

/918/f2d/174 · .json · Public domain