State v. Kallio’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of America (1989), Morabito v. Wachsman (1983)
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hampton v. State Highway Commission · Smith v. State · State v. Silva · Lindauer v. Allen · State v. Webster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he State has a duty to exercise due care to keep its highways reasonably safe for the traveling public. Inherent in this duty of care is the alternative duty to either remedy a known hazardous condition on its highways or give appropriate warning of its presence. [Citations omitted.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to exercise due care to keep its highways reasonably safe for the traveling public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.