Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J. Eq. 231

Dobbin v. Plager

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 21, 1920

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1920-10-21

“The answer is a categorical denial of the allegations of the bill, with the qualification that the defendant denies ‘that she voluntarily and consciously agreed to sell the property for1 $11,000.’ “The meaning of this ambiguous phraseology was brought out at the trial where it was set up- that the purchase price agreed upon was $15,000, and that when Mrs. Plager signed the contract it was with the understanding that that, and not $11,000, was stipulated.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1920-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1985

1 district · 1 state decisions

101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15.For reversal—None.
/92/njeq/231 · .json · Public domain