Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J. Eq. 455

Lean v. Leeds

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1921

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1921-02-28

At this time, however, I wish to outline my views sufficiently to enable counsel to at least apprehend the present condition of my mind in the matter. “I am unable to see at this time any possible defence to this ease, unless, perchance, it he a defence growing out of the mental condition of the defendant—the want of intelligent and volunta.ry action up'on her part at the moment she signed the contract of sale.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1921-02-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1988

9 state decisions

301921193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

*460For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Savayze, Trenct-iard,Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacíi, White, I-Ieppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—13.For reversal—None.
/92/njeq/455 · .json · Public domain