Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J. Eq. 682

Duncan v. Murphy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1921

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1921-06-20

Duncan, for his use, comfort and maintenance during the term of his natural life; and after his death I give, devise and bequeath my said estate or the residue thereof to my two daughters, Mary Murphy and Annie Hall, in equal shares, to them, their heirs and assigns forever.’ “The contention of complainant is that Edward F. Duncan is by this clause of the will given not only a life estate in the real and personal property of testatrix but also the right to sell part or all…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1921-06-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1949

6 state decisions

30192119301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner—11.For reversal—Swayze, Bergen—2.
/92/njeq/682 · .json · Public domain