Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J.L. 254

Switch v. Mullenbach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 3, 1918

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1918-05-03

Petitioner’s decedent, Andrew Mullenbach, was employed by the prosecutor as a foreman on March 11th, 1916; while engaged in lifting a heavy steel girder he strained the muscles of his back, aggravating two hernias; as a result he had to undergo an operation; he afterwards, on June 4th, 1916, died of a post-operative pneumonia. The trial court found as a fact that the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. This is the controverted question in the case.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1935

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1918-05-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmcmce — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal — Hone.

/92/njl/254 · .json · Public domain