Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J.L. 501

Barto v. Benker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 11, 1918

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1918-10-11

“The facts found by the District Court judge are, that the plaintiff agreed to purchase the business of the defendant, which included a license for the sale of liquors, the consideration being $1,000, upon which $550 was paid in cash and the balance in promissory notes; that a bill of sale was made by the defendant to the plaintiff and also a power of attorney permitting the plaintiff to carry on the business in defendant’s name and to run and manage the saloon as fully as…

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2001

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1918-10-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance• — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

¶3For reversal — None.

/92/njl/501 · .json · Public domain