State v. Rosenberg

On error to the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: “The plaintiff in error was convicted before the Atlantic; Quarter Sessions on an indictment charging that he “unlawfully did buy and purchase from one Edward Bowers, a minor under the age of sixteen years, two metal hinges, which said personal property may have been stolen.’ ““The crime intended to be charged in the indictment was a violation of the supplement to the Crimes act passed in 1903 (Pamph.