Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J.L. 641

State v. Cohn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1919

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1919-03-03

On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following memorandum was filed by Chief Justice Gummere: The only question to be determined in this case is whether the crime of which the defendant was convicted had been outlawed prior to the finding of the indictment. For the reasons set forth in the opinion which was delivered by ns at the present term, in the case of State v. Morris Ruduer (ante p. 20) we consider that it was.

Decided 1919-03-03

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal — None.

/92/njl/641 · .json · Public domain