Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 N.J.L. 645

State v. Rudner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1919

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1919-03-03

<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported m 92 N. J. L. 20.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1983

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1919-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.

¶2(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)

¶3For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.

¶4For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.

/92/njl/645 · .json · Public domain