Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Armstrong v. State · 608 So. 2d 762 - Ex Parte State · 728 So. 2d 673 - Owens v. State · 707 So. 2d 294 - Trice v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) the requirement that a revocation hearing be held, (2) the requirement that there be an adequate written revocation order, and (3) the requirement that the probationer be informed of his right to request counsel. See, e.g., Jackson v. State, 867 So.2d 365 (Ala.Crim.App.2003), and Evans v. State, 794 So.2d 1234 (Ala.Crim.App.2000).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“but that a full accounting should not be required for this court to find error. The State agrees that the record is unclear as to the total amount of time Smitherman has already served and as to how it was calculated. 1 The State asks this court to remand this cause for clarification. Section 15-22-54 (d)(3), Ala. Code 1975, provides in part:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smitherman v. State“If revocation results in a sentence of confinement, credit shall be given for all time spent in custody prior to revocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smitherman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.