925 F. Supp. 653 - Gorman v. Bartch’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · North Haven Board of Education v. Bell · Grove City College v. Bell · Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The term “qualified individual with a disability” means an individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable modifications to the rules, policies, or practices, removal of architectural, communication or transportation barriers, or the provision of auxiliary aids and services, meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in the programs or activities provided by a public entity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. Truitt“department, agency ... or other instrumentality”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.