Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

926 A.2d 925

Commonwealth v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2007-07-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2012

4 state decisions

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-07-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*926ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 10th day of July 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED in part. The Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for the court to consider the claim, which was raised in his brief below, but not addressed by the panel, of whether petitioner’s confession should be suppressed because his waiver of rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), was not knowing and voluntary.

/926/a2d/925 · .json · Public domain