Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. J.M. Huber Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
927 F.2d 1322 · 1991
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably Shirley v. Chrysler First, Inc. (1992), Veprinsky v. Fluor Daniel, Inc. (1996)
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 713 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees or applicants for employment ... because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under this subchapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[t]here is no ground for affording any less protection [against retaliation] to defendant's former employees than to its present employees' under Title VII.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“benefits to which he was otherwise entitled simply because he filed a charge, the company would be guilty of retaliation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.