Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Nev. 677 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2017

15 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lisby v. State · Tucker v. State · Lapinski v. State · Holland v. State · Holbrook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not necessary that the defendant’s guilt should be established beyond any doubt or to an absolute certainty, but instead thereof that the defendant’s guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt as hereinafter defined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) A reasonable doubt is one based on reason. It is not mere' possible doubt, but is such a doubt as would govern or control a person in the more weighty affairs of life. If the minds of the jurors, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, are in such a condition that they can say they feel an abiding conviction of the truth of the charge, there is not a reasonable doubt. Doubt to be reasonable must be actual and substantial,'not mere possibility or speculation. (2) No other definition of reasonable doubt shall be given by the court to juries in criminal actions in this state. (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.