Newman v. Mankowitz

Eor the prosecutor it is claimed that there is nothing in the evidence to support a finding by the trial court that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. “The facts are substantially as follows: Botkin was in the wholesale milk business; Mankowitz was his son-in-law and described by the witnesses as his right-hand man; the evidence justifies the conclusion that he was Botkin’s general utility man. “Botkin ha$ a creamery at Whitehouse, New Jersey,…