Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 N.J.L. 478

State v. Bowen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1919

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1919-11-17

He brings up the entire record of the trial and assigns error upon his bill of exceptions. “Upon examination of the points thus raised and argued we find no reason to disturb the judgment. “The first point to be considered is, that the third count of the indictment, upon which alone 'the defendant was convicted, does not charge an indictable offence. “But this is not so.

Decided 1919-11-17

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for tlie reasons set forth in tlie opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2*482For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscii, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.

¶3For reversal — Hone.

/93/njl/478 · .json · Public domain