DeGraff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Rogers v. Corrosion Products, Inc. · Robison v. State · Jones v. State · Pugh v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Members of the jury, I have received your last note. And the note asks the Court a question about testimony. The law does not allow me to comment on the testimony or to give you my views on what was said or not said. I have taken your note as meaning that you are in disagreement, possibly over some portion of the testimony (emphasis added). Therefore, I have instructed the Court Reporter to review her notes regarding what I feel like is the testimony you are in conflict over. She has reviewed them, and I am going to have her now read back to you certain items of testimony which I am deducing from the note (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeGraff v. State“Did Officer Keener testify that Mr. De-Graff told him that he hit Ms. Royer?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeGraff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.