Johnson v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
939 F.2d 180 · 1991
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 933 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 28 U.S.C. § 452 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302
Relies on Feres v. United States · Barr v. Matteo · Bush v. Lucas · Cherek v. United States · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“found it incredible that the United States Attorney could make an affidavit that the words of the Admiral that the policeman who had stopped the Admiral's daughter for speeding was 'a liar,' were words spoken while the Admiral was acting within the scope of his employment as an employee of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Johnson v. Carter“[a]ny other civil action or proceeding [except under § 1346(b) and § 2672] for money damages arising out of or relating to the same subject matter against the employee or the employee's estate is precluded without regard to when the act or omission occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Johnson v. Carter“[u]pon certification by the Attorney General that the defendant employee was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim arose ... the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.