Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 P.2d 20 - Wright v. Parks

Wright v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2024

3 state decisions

101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schepp v. Hess · Southard v. Oil Equipment Corporation · Kelly v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court should allow amendment, rather than dismissal, unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff cannot state a claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.