Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 ARK 176 - Miller v. Carr

Miller v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 1960
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1960

12 state decisions

40191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCulloch v. Campbell · Smith v. Boswell · Jenkins v. Tobin · Guthrie v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It Avas necessary for them (contestants) to show that the will was procured by undue influence, that is to say, the undue influence that will avoid a will must be directly connected with, its execution, must be the procuring cause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.