94 N.J. Eq. 233
Decided September 22, 1922
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1922-09-22
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-09-22
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1976
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
¶2For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—15.
¶3For reversal—None.