94 N.J. Eq. 511
Decided February 2, 1923
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1923-02-02
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-02-02
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1975
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
¶2For affirmance■—Ti-ib Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Williams, Van Buskirk—10.
¶3For reversal—Katzenbaoh—-1.