94 N.J.L. 262
Decided March 1, 1920
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1920-03-01
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 287.</p>
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1962
5 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1920-03-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, I-Ieppenttetmer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal—None.