Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

947 A.2d 1239

Gbur v. Golio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 2008

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2008-04-22

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2019

6 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the pelvis, the lower thoracic spine, right ribs, right mandible . . . consistent with osseous metastatic disease.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Gbur v. Golio

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the MCARE Act foreclosed a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action against a urologist from offering expert testimony from a radiation oncologist to develop the applicable standard of care for the treatment of a cancer patient, upon the urologist’s review of a bone density study indicating “multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the pelvis, the lower thoracic spine, right ribs, right mandible ... consistent with osseous metastatic disease.”
Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
/947/a2d/1239 · .json · Public domain