¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
95 N.J.L. 243
Callahan v. Siebert
Decided October 15, 1920
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1920-10-15
“ lit is further mutually agreed between the parties hereto that unless the loan can be arranged and settlement made in accordance to conditions recited herein, that this agreement shall he considered null and void safe harmless to either party and that the vendor shall return to the vendee the deposit he has received on account of this agreement.’ “There was a further provision that time is, of the essence of the contract.
Decided 1920-10-15